EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

WENDEL - CARLYLE / STAHL

M.4236

WENDEL INVESTISSEMENT / CARLYLE / STAHL HOLDINGWENDEL - CARLYLE / STAHL
June 18, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Disclaimer :

The Competition DG makes the information provided by the notifying parties in section 1.2 of Form CO available to the public in order to increase transparency. This information has been prepared by the notifying parties under their sole responsibility, and its content in no way prejudges the view the Commission may take of the planned operation. Nor can the Commission be held responsible for any incorrect or misleading information contained therein.

COMP/M.4236 - WENDEL-CARLYLE / STAHL

SECTION 1.2

Description of the concentration

The contemplated transaction involves the acquisition of joint control by Wendel Investissement (hereafter “Wendel”) and Carlyle Europe Partners II LP, a subsidiary of the Carlyle Group (hereafter “Carlyle”) over Stahl Holding NV, which is currently held by Leather Luxembourg SA. Wendel and Carlyle have signed a share purchase agreement in this respect on 29 April 2006. Wendel is a listed investment firm that invests in companies active in industry and services in France and abroad. Carlyle is a private global investment firm. Stahl is a company active in the manufacture and trade of chemical products. Stahl represents a strategic investment for both Wendel and Carlyle, as the leather chemicals business is expected to grow. No horizontal overlap and no vertical relationship exist between the parties and Stahl. As a result, there are no horizontally or vertically affected markets within the meaning of Section 6 of Form CO and, consequently, the contemplated transaction does not raise any competition concern.

EUC

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia