- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-625/11: Action brought on 2 December 2011 — BSH v OHIM (ecodoor)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0625
62011TN0625
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.2.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 32/39
(Case T-625/11)
2012/C 32/77
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by S. Biagosch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 September 2011 in Case R 340/2011-1;
—Order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ecoDoor’ for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11
Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of registration.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the Community mark concerned is distinctive and not purely descriptive.