I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Officials - Retirement pension - Reforms of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 - Transitional measures relating to certain methods for calculating pension rights - Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Temporary agents who become officials - Annual rate of accrual of pension rights - Retirement age - Scope of the law - Equal treatment)
(C/2025/4452)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: DB, DC, DD (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Bukšek Tomac and M. Mão Cheia Carreira, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Alver, M. Bauer and X. Chamodraka, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff, A. Baeckelmans and G. Niddam, acting as Agents)
By their action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 25 May 2023 determining DB’s retirement pension rights and the decisions of the Parliament of 4 July 2023 refusing the requests of DC and DD seeking the application of Articles 21 and 22 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for the purpose of determining their retirement age and the annual rate of accrual of their pension rights.
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders DB, DC and DD to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament;
Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Commission each to bear their own costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/2960, 6.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4452/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—