I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2020/C 201/62)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Fidia farmaceutici SpA (Abano Terme, Italy) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutial Laboratories SA (Athens, Greece)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark HYAL — European Union trade mark No 2 430 221
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 January 2020 in Case R 613/2019-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs; in the alternative, if the other party before the Board of Appeal intervenes, order EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 165(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Articles 32(f) and 39(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 59(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.