I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
5.2.2024
(C/2024/1111)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Glashütter Uhrenbetrieb GmbH — Glashütte/Sa. (Glashütte, Germany) (represented by: D. von Schultz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark Glashütte ORIGINAL –Application No 18 727 034
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2023 in Case R 773/2023-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, inasmuch as it rejected the filing of the EU trade mark No 18 727 034, that is to say, for certain goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 41, and
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1111/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)