- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-205/15: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sibiu — Romania) — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP) v Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horațiu-Vasile Cruduleci (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right of access to a court — Principle of equality of arms — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Proceedings for the enforcement of a judicial decision ordering the repayment of a tax levied in breach of EU law — Exemption of public authorities from certain legal costs — Jurisdiction of the Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0205
62015CA0205
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.9.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 335/19
(Case C-205/15) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right of access to a court - Principle of equality of arms - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness - Proceedings for the enforcement of a judicial decision ordering the repayment of a tax levied in breach of EU law - Exemption of public authorities from certain legal costs - Jurisdiction of the Court))
(2016/C 335/25)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP)
Defendants: Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horațiu-Vasile Cruduleci
Operative part of the judgment
Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of equivalence and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which exempts legal persons governed by public law from judicial stamping fees when they lodge an objection to the enforcement of a judicial decision relating to the repayment of taxes levied in breach of EU law and exempts those persons from the obligation to lodge a security at the time of bringing an application for a stay of such enforcement proceedings, while the applications submitted by legal and natural persons governed by private law in the context of such procedures remain, in principle, subject to court costs.
* Language of the case: Romanian.
(2016/C 335/25)
ECLI:EU:C:2016:140