- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-91/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of good administration — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time — Psychological harassment — Principle of legal certainty — Material and non-material damage)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0091
62020TA0091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.10.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 418/17
(Case T-91/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Principle of good administration - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Reasonable time - Psychological harassment - Principle of legal certainty - Material and non-material damage)
(2022/C 418/20)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WT (represented by: V. Villante, D. Rovetta and D. Birkenmaier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 by which the Commission imposed on her a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand and, second, compensation for the non-material and material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders WT to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.
* * *
Language of the case: English