EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-669/23, Zhang: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Limburg (Netherlands) lodged on 13 November 2023 — C v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0669

62023CN0669

November 13, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/631

15.1.2024

(Case C-669/23, Zhang (*) )

(C/2024/631)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: C

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

Questions referred

(1)Must Articles 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 of the Return Directive (**) be interpreted as meaning that it is only if the interests and principles referred to in Article 5 of the Return Directive precluding removal by the Member State to the country of destination also preclude a third-country national from not voluntarily or independently being able to comply with the obligation to return by departing to another third country that no return decision may be adopted, or a return decision which has already been adopted must be withdrawn or suspended?

(2)Is national legislation under which entitlement to basic services is linked to lawful residence compatible with Article 5 of the Return Directive, in conjunction with recitals 12 and 24 thereof and Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and, if so, must the existence of such legislation be taken into account in determining whether a return decision can be adopted and/or maintained where a third-country national cannot be removed?

(*) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(**) Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/631/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia