- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-495/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 May 2008 — Belfass v Council (Public procurement — Community tender procedure — Obvious clerical error — Award to the tender offering best value for money — Abnormally low tender — Article 139(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 — Plea of illegality — Specifications — Admissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62004TA0495
62004TA0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/31
(Case T-495/04)(Public procurement - Community tender procedure - Obvious clerical error - Award to the tender offering best value for money - Abnormally low tender - Article 139(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Plea of illegality - Specifications - Admissibility)
(2008/C 171/55)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Belfass SPRL (Forest, Belguim) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)
Re:
Application, first, for the annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union of 13 October 2004 to reject both the tenders submitted by the applicant under tender procedure UCA-033/04 and, secondly, for compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the Council's conduct.
Operative part of the judgment
1.Annuls the decision of the Council of the European Union of 13 October 2004 to reject the tenders of Belfass SPRL submitted under tender procedure UCA-033/04, in so far as that decision rejected Belfass' offer with respect to Lot No 2;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.