EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-74/22: Action brought on 8 February 2022 — Siemens v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0074

62022TN0074

February 8, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.3.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/30

(Case T-74/22)

(2022/C 138/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Siemens SAS (Saint-Denis, France) (represented by: E. Berkani, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

primarily,

annul the two decisions of 8 December 2021 rejecting the tenders of the temporary group of undertakings, which Siemens SAS is a member of, in respect of Lot 1 and Lot 2;

annul the two decisions awarding Lot 1 to Santerne Alsace and Lot 2 to Detection Electronique Française (DEF);

in the alternative,

order the European Parliament to pay a sum of EUR 1 967 994 to Siemens SAS as compensation for the damages arising from the loss of opportunity to obtain Lots 1 and 2 of the disputed contract;

in any event,

order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action against the two decisions of the European Parliament of 8 December 2021 rejecting the tenders it submitted for Lots 1 and 2 in the context of tendering procedure No 06A70/2021/M004 concerning the renewal of the fire safety system in the European Parliament buildings in Strasbourg, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging an illegality in the exclusion of Siemens SAS from Lots 1 and 2. The applicant alleges, first, a manifest error of assessment in the scoring of the tenders by the European Parliament and, second, breach of the principle of transparency by reason of the transmission by the Parliament to Siemens SAS of a flawed simulation tool which played a decisive role in the preparation of the tenders.

Second plea in law, alleging the non-contractual liability of the Parliament. The applicant seeks compensation for the damage suffered as a result of the loss of opportunity to obtain the award of Lots 1 and 2.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia