I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-376/18) (*)
(Action for annulment - International agreements - Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco - Decision authorising the opening of negotiations between the European Union and Morocco for the purpose of amending the partnership agreement - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(2019/C 131/59)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) (represented by: G. Devers, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and F. Naert, Agents)
Action under Article 263 for annulment of the Council’s decision of 16 April 2018, authorising the opening of negotiations with the Kingdom of Morocco for the purpose of amending the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco and concluding a protocol implementing that agreement.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the French Republic and the European Commission.
3.The Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia-el-Hamra et du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.
4.The Commission and the French Republic shall bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.
* * *