- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006.#Herbert Meister v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-12/05 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2006:779
62005CO0012
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑12/05 P)
Appeal – Employment – Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded
3. Appeal – Grounds – Insufficient reasoning (see paras 82-84)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 28 October 2004 in Case T‑76/03 Meister v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of OHIM’s decision of 22 April 2002 appointing the appellant, in the interest of the service, with his post, as legal adviser to the Vice‑President for Legal Affairs.
Operative part
The Court:
3. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is ordered to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.