EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-36/23, Familienkasse Sachsen: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen – Germany) – L v Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Family benefits – Article 68 – Rules of priority in the case of overlapping of benefits – Obligation on the institution of the Member State having secondary competence to forward an application for family benefits to the institution of the Member State having primary competence – No application for family benefits in the child’s Member State of residence – Partial recovery of family benefits paid in the Member State of activity as an employed person of one of the parents)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0036

62023CA0036

April 25, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3573

17.6.2024

(Case C-36/23, Familienkasse Sachsen)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Family benefits - Article 68 - Rules of priority in the case of overlapping of benefits - Obligation on the institution of the Member State having secondary competence to forward an application for family benefits to the institution of the Member State having primary competence - No application for family benefits in the child’s Member State of residence - Partial recovery of family benefits paid in the Member State of activity as an employed person of one of the parents)

(C/2024/3573)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: L

Defendant: Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit

Operative part of the judgment

Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, which lays down priority rules in the event of overlapping family benefits,

must be interpreted as meaning that although it does not allow the institution of a Member State whose legislation does not have priority according to the criteria referred to in paragraph 1 of that article to claim from the person concerned partial reimbursement of such benefits paid in that Member State, on account of the existence of a right to those benefits provided for in the legislation of another Member State applicable by priority, where no family benefit has been fixed or paid in that other Member State, it nevertheless allows that institution to claim from the institution with primary competence the reimbursement of the amount of benefits which exceeds that which it is required to reimburse under the provisions of that regulation.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3573/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia