- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-163/07 P: Order of the Court of 27 November 2007 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Public works contracts — Admissibility — Essential procedural conditions — Mandatory representation of natural or legal persons by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State — Appeal clearly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007CB0163
62007CB0163
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.2.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 51/30
(Case C-163/07 P)
(Appeal - Public works contracts - Admissibility - Essential procedural conditions - Mandatory representation of natural or legal persons by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State - Appeal clearly unfounded)
(2008/C 51/50)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar (represented by: C. Șahin, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. van Nuffel and F. Hoffmeister, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 17 January 2007 in Case T-129/06 Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Akar v Commission in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible an application for, first, the annulment of the decision of the Commission of 23 December 2005 relating to the award of the public works contract for the construction of educational establishments in the provinces of Siirt and Diyarbakir and, secondly, suspension of the implementation of the procedure in question — No information, in the contested decision, as to the need to be represented by a lawyer qualified to practise before a court of a Member State in the event of proceedings being brought against the contested decision — Regularised application lodged out of time.
Operative part
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar are ordered to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.
Language of the case: German