I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Public supply contracts - Negotiated procedure - Renovation of the Paul-Henri Spaak Building - Annulment of the negotiated procedure - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2025/2528)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: JDS Architects ApS (Copenhagen, Denmark), Coldefy & associés architectes urbanistes (Lille, France), NL Architects BV (Van Hallstraat, Netherlands), Carlorattiassociati Srl (Turin, Italy), Ensamble studio SL (Las Rozas, Spain) (represented by: M. Vastmans, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Caiola, L. Chrétien and F. Poilvache, acting as Agents)
By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment, first, of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 on the renovation of the Paul-Henri Spaak and, second, of the decision of the Parliament of 20 July 2023 rejecting the tender that they submitted under the negotiated procedure bearing the reference 06D40/2023/M028.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders JDS Architects ApS, Coldefy & associés architectes urbanistes, NL Architects BV, Carlorattiassociati Srl and Ensamble studio SL to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2023/350, 30.10.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2528/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—