- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-106/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2008 — Demp v OHIM — BAU HOW (BAU HOW) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BAU HOW — Earlier figurative marks BAUHAUS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(a) and (b), and Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TA0106
62006TA0106
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 64/36
(Case T-106/06)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark BAU HOW - Earlier figurative marks BAUHAUS - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(a) and (b), and Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2008/C 64/57)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Demp BV, formerly Demp Holding BV (Maastricht, Netherlands) (represented by: R.-D. Härer, C. Schultze, J Ossing and C. Weber, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BAU HOW GmbH (Hattersheim/Okriftel, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2006 (Case R 92/2004-4) on opposition proceedings between Demp BV and BAU HOW GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
1.The action is dismissed;
2.Demp BV is ordered to pay the costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 143 of 17.6.2006.