- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-811/16: Action brought on 18 November 2016 — Di Bernardo v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0811
62016TN0811
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/49
(Case T-811/16)
(2017/C 030/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Danilo Di Bernardo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the decision of 10 August 2016 by which the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 excluded the applicant from that competition;
—order the Commission to pay all of the costs in any event.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a number of manifest errors of assessment on the part of the selection board when evaluating the applicant’s professional experience.
2.Second plea in law, raised in the alternative, alleging insufficient reasoning of the contested decision on the basis of the failure to inform the applicant of the selection criteria established by the selection board.