I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 340/17
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Ulf Kazimierz Radziejewski
Defendant: Kronofogdemyndigheten i Stockholm
Can the requirement for Swedish residence in Paragraph 4 of the skuldsaneringslagen (2006:548) (Law on debt relief) be regarded as being liable to prevent or deter a worker from leaving Sweden to exercise his right to freedom of movement and thus be regarded as running counter to the provision on the freedom of movement for workers within the Union provided for in Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?