- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-401/24: Action brought on 1 August 2024 – BDSwiss v EUIPO (BDSwiss)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0401
62024TN0401
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5829
7.10.2024
(Case T-401/24)
(C/2024/5829)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: BDSwiss AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: J.-A. Fortmeyer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International application to extend European Union word mark BDSwiss to Brazil, China, Canada, Japan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Türkiye, Singapore and the Russian Federation – Application No 12 708 749_01
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2024 in Case R 206/2024-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—refer the applicant’s international application to extend the protection of the contested European Union word mark to Brazil, China, Canada, Japan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Türkiye, Singapore and the Russian Federation for services in Class 36 to WIPO;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 184(5)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5829/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—