- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-437/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Vanhove v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (bistro Régent)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0437
62022TN0437
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.8.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 326/28
(Case T-437/22)
(2022/C 326/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Vanhove (Bordeaux, France) (represented by: N. Castagnon, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Einkauf SE & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark bistro Régent — Application for registration No 18 136 358
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 May 2022 in Case R 1113/2021-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—grant the European Union trade mark registration in respect of the designated ‘wines’ in Class 33;
—order EUIPO and, in case of an intervention, also the intervener to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.