- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-261/00: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Sacaim and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62000TB0261
62000TB0261
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.2.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/23
(Case T-261/00) (<a id="ntc1-C_2013038EN.01002301-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2013038EN.01002301-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2013/C 38/40
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicants: Sacaim SpA (Venice, Italy); Alfier Costruzioni Srl (Venice); Azin Asfalti Srl (Venice); Barbato Srl (Venice); Camata Costruzioni Sas (Venice); Dal Carlo Mario & C. Srl (Venice); Impresa Costruzioni Civili e Montaggi Srl (ICCEM) (Marghera, Italy); Rossi Renzo Costruzioni Srl (Marcon, Italy); Vettore Costruzioni Srl (Venice); ACEA — Associazione dei Costruttori Edili ed Affini di Venezia e Provincia (Venice); and Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ (Marghera) (represented by: A. Vianello, M. Merola, A. Sodano and M. Pappalardo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the applicants: The Italian Republic (represented: initially by U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (<a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:L:2000:150:TOC">OJ 2000, L 150, p. 50</a>).
Operative part of the order
1.The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance of the case.
2.The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
3.Sacaim SpA, Alfier Costruzioni Srl, Azin Asfalti Srl, Barbato Srl, Camata Costruzioni Sas, Dal Carlo Mario & C. Srl, Impresa Costruzioni Civili e Montaggi Srl (ICCEM), Rossi Renzo Costruzioni Srl, Vettore Costruzioni Srl, ACEA — Associazione dei Costruttori Edili ed Affini di Venezia e Provincia and Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.
4.The Italian Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2013038EN.01002301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2013038EN.01002301-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 355, 9.12.2000).
* * *