- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-759/16: Order of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — Campailla v European Union (Action for damages — Law governing the institutions — Liability of the European Union — Decisions delivered by the General Court and by the Court of Justice — Action dismissed by the General Court as inadmissible — Appeal dismissed as inadmissible on the ground of lack of representation — Action manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0759
62016TB0759
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.3.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/31
(Case T-759/16)(Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Liability of the European Union - Decisions delivered by the General Court and by the Court of Justice - Action dismissed by the General Court as inadmissible - Appeal dismissed as inadmissible on the ground of lack of representation - Action manifestly inadmissible)
(2018/C 112/40)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Massimo Campailla (Holtz, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: initially J. Inghelram and L. Tonini Alabiso, and subsequently J. Inghelram and V. Hanley-Emilsson, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the order of 6 October 2011, Campailla v Commission (C-265/11 P, not published, EU:C:2011:644).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Mr Massimo Campailla shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 78, 13.3.17.