- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-860/16: Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Wirecard v EUIPO (mycard2go) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark mycard2go — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0860
62016TA0860
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-860/16) (*1)
‘(EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark mycard2go — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))’
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 October 2016 (Case R 281/2016-4) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign mycard2go as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Wirecard AG to pay the costs.
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
* * *