- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-443/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PV v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0443
62022TN0443
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 380/17
(Case T-443/22)
(2022/C 380/20)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: PV (represented by: P. Giatagantzidis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decisions, namely (a) Decision 015/2022 of 23 March 2022 of the College of the defendant rejecting the complaint of 3 December 2021 against Decision 090/2021 of 8 September 2021 of the College of the defendant, (b) Decision 090/2021 of 8 September 2021 of the College of the defendant, (c) Decision 021/2022 of 30 May 2022 of the College of the defendant and (d) any other related action or omission of the organs of the defendant,
—order the defendant to pay the total amount of EUR 100 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered, and
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of her action, the applicant raises the same pleas as those relied on in Case T-442/22, PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.