- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-427/18: Action brought on 10 July 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0427
62018TN0427
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 301/44
(Case T-427/18)
(2018/C 301/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: André Geske (Lübbecke, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Mark at issue: EU figurative mark SATISFYERMEN — Application No 16 886 541
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2018 in Case R 2603/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.