- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-4/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 8 December 2014 — Cwik v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Appraisal — Staff report — Appraisal period 1995/1997 — Enforcement of a judgment of the General Court — Application for annulment of the staff report — No referral to the Joint Committee on Staff Reports — Delay in the drawing up of the staff report — Action for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FA0004
62013FA0004
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.1.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 26/43
(Case F-4/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil Service - Officials - Appraisal - Staff report - Appraisal period 1995/1997 - Enforcement of a judgment of the General Court - Application for annulment of the staff report - No referral to the Joint Committee on Staff Reports - Delay in the drawing up of the staff report - Action for damages))
(2015/C 026/55)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Michael Cwik (Tervuren, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the decision adopting the applicant’s staff report in respect of the period from 1995 to 1997 and an application for damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the European Commission’s decision of 12 March 2012 definitively establishing Mr Cwik’s new staff report in respect of the appraisal period 1995/1997;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Cwik the sum of EUR 15 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Cwik.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 108, 13/4/2013, p. 38.