- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-629/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 7 December 2016 — CX
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0629
62016CN0629
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/26
(Case C-629/16)
(2017/C 104/38)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: CX
Other party: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Schärding
Question referred
Does EU law, and in particular the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (64/733/EEC), Journal Officiel 1964, 217, p. 3687/64, the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement, Journal Officiel 1972, L 293, p. 3, and Decision No 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union (96/142/EC), OJ 1996 L 35, p. 1, preclude national legislation under which goods transport undertakings established in the Republic of Turkey may engage in cross-border commercial carriage of goods to or through the territory of the Republic of Austria only if they have, in respect of the motor vehicles concerned, passes issued as part of a quota established between Austria and Turkey pursuant to a bilateral agreement, or if they are granted authorisation for the individual carriage of goods, in which case there must be a significant public interest in the individual carriage of goods and the applicant must demonstrate that the journey cannot be avoided by organisational measures or by the choice of a different means of transport?
ECLI:EU:C:2017:140