- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-231/20: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — Price v Council (Action for annulment — Area of freedom, security and justice — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom — Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on withdrawal — United Kingdom nationals — Loss of EU citizenship — Act not of individual concern — Non-regulatory act — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0231(01)
62020TB0231(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
(Case T-231/20) (*)
(Action for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on withdrawal - United Kingdom nationals - Loss of EU citizenship - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 310/36)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: David Price (Le Dorat, France) (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)
Defendant): Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and M. Joséphidès, Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment in part of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 7) and of Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Commission.
3.Mr David Price is ordered to bear, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those regarding the application for interim measures, with the exception of those related to the application for leave to intervene.
4.Mr Price, the Council and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.
* * *
(*) Language of the case: French.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15