I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2024/3802)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Serana Europe GmbH (Pessin, Germany) (represented by: T. Bösling and I. George, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung GmbH (Greven, Germany)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark Marrowgrow – Application No 18 567 546
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2024 in Case R 1706/2023-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision to the effect that the opposition filed by Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung GmbH against EU trade mark application No 18 567 546 ‘Marrowgrow’ is rejected and the appellant before the Board of Appeal is ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 8(4) in conjunction with Article 71 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3802/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—