I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-37/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark CIMPRESS - Earlier EU figurative mark impress - Earlier national word mark Impress-Media - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 201/29)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Cimpress Schweiz GmbH (Winterthur, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, P. Böhner and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Impress Media GmbH (Mönchengladbach, Germany) (represented by: F. Remmertz, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 October 2018 (Joined Cases R 1716/2017-2 and R 1786/2017-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Impress Media and Cimpress Schweiz.
The Court:
1.Authorises Impress GmbH to replace Impress Media GmbH as intervener;
2.Dismisses the action;
3.Orders Cimpress Schweiz GmbH to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Impress.
(*)
Language of the case: German
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140