- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-56/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Strobl v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading under the new, less favourable rules — Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of equality — Age discrimination)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62005FA0056
62005FA0056
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/21
(Case F-56/05) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Grading under the new, less favourable rules - Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Protection of legitimate expectations - Principle of equality - Age discrimination)
(2012/C 138/38)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Peter Strobl (Greifenberg-Beuern, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, and subsequently by J. Currall, Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm et I. Šulce, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Commission’s decision classifying the applicant, who was placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, under the less favourable provisions of those regulations (Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials)
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs;
3.Orders the Council of the European Union, the intervener, to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 229, 17.9.2005, p. 28 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under the Number T-260/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).