EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-755/18: Order of the General Court of 20 August 2020 — FL Brüterei M-V and Others v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Organic farming — Livestock production — Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs — Use of non-organic animals — Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules — Lack of direct concern — No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0755

62018TB0755

August 20, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

3.11.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/10

(Case T-755/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Organic farming - Livestock production - Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs - Use of non-organic animals - Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules - Lack of direct concern - No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 371/09)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: FL Brüterei M-V GmbH (Finkenthal, Germany), Erdegut GmbH (Finkenthal), Ökofarm Groß Markow GmbH (Lelkendorf, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, B. Eggers and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents)

Re:

In the first place, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Article 1(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1584 of 22 October 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control (OJ 2018 L 264, p. 1), and, in the second place, application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for, first, the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the adoption of that article and, second, the harm allegedly suffered by FL Brüterei M-V as a result of the Commission’s failure to ensure compliance by the Dutch authorities with Article 42 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control (OJ 2008 L 250, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed.

2.FL Brüterei M-V GmbH, Erdegut GmbH and Ökofarm Groß Markow GmbH shall pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia