- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-131/24, VIRUS and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria), lodged on 16 February 2024 – Umweltorganisation VIRUS – Verein Projektwerkstatt für Umwelt und Soziales and Others v Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, Abteilung Landesstraßenplanung – ST3
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0131
62024CN0131
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3158
21.5.2024
(Case C-131/24, VIRUS and Others)
(C/2024/3158)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Complainants: Umweltorganisation VIRUS – Verein Projektwerkstatt für Umwelt und Soziales Bürgerinitiative ‘Nein zur Spange Wörth’, A.H. and Others, Umweltorganisation Verein Lebenswertes Traisental, Umweltorganisation FG LANIUS – Forschungsgemeinschaft für regionale Faunistik und angewandten Naturschutz
Defendant: Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, Abteilung Landesstraßenplanung – ST3
Authority which adopted the contested decision: Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, Gruppe Wirtschaft, Sport und Tourismus, Abteilung Anlagenrecht – WST1
Other parties to the proceedings: Autobahnen- und Schnellstraßen-Finanzierungs-Aktiengesellschaft (ASFINAG), Stadt St. Pölten, Marktgemeinde Ober-Grafendorf
Questions referred
1.Is Article 5 of Directive 2009/147/EC (Birds Directive) to be interpreted as meaning that a case of deliberate disturbance, as referred to under point (d) of that article, is not constituted if, notwithstanding the fact that individual specimens of certain species could be disturbed, any effect on the objective of Article 2 of that directive will be prevented by means of measures effectively implemented in a timely and appropriate manner?
2.If the first question is answered in the affirmative, must all scientific doubt concerning the effectiveness of the measures be excluded, as evidenced by a well-reasoned, professional appraisal of a court-appointed expert, or must there be objective scientific literature of successful practical experiences of those measures?
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3158/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—