I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Action for annulment – Time-limit for bringing an action – Lateness – Absence of excusable error – Manifest inadmissibility
1. Procedure – Division of jurisdiction between the various Community courts – Action for annulment brought by a Member of the Court of Auditors against a decision of that institution – Lack of jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal (Art. 230 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Annex I, Art. 8(2)) (see paras 26-27)
3. Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Point from which time starts to run – Notification (Art. 230, fifth para., EC) (see paras 41-42)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 20 March 2006 refusing to allocate to the applicant, the widow of a former Member of the Court of Auditors, a survivor’s pension on the ground that the condition that the couple had to have been married for five years at the time of death has not been satisfied (case registered as F-46/08 and referred by the Civil Service Tribunal).
1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.