- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-531/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 3 — General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights — Article 14 — Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ — Consultation of a patent lawyer — Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0531
62020CA0531
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/9
(Case C-531/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property rights - Directive 2004/48/EC - Article 3 - General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights - Article 14 - Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ - Consultation of a patent lawyer - Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party)
(2022/C 237/11)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: NovaText GmbH
Defendant: Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Operative part of the judgment
Articles 3 and 14 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or an interpretation thereof which does not allow the court before which an action is brought under that directive to take due account, in each case brought before it, of its specific characteristics for the purposes of assessing whether the legal costs incurred by the successful party are reasonable and proportionate.
Language of the case: German.
*
<a id="ntr1-C_2022237EN.01000902-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2022237EN.01000902-E0001">(<span class="oj-super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2021:028:TOC">OJ C 28, 25.1.2021</a>.
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140