EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-373/13 P: Appeal brought on 17 July 2013 by FK (*) against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 May 2013 in Case F-87/12 FK (*) v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0373

62013TN0373

July 17, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/32

Appeal brought on 17 July 2013 by FK (*) against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 May 2013 in Case F-87/12 FK (*) v Commission

(Case T-373/13 P)

(2013/C 325/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: FK (*) (represented by: S. Orlandi, D. Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant

Set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2013 in Case F-87/12 FK v European Commission

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant relies on single plea in law, alleging error of law, as the CST held that annulment of the decision to limit the extension period of the appellant’s contract as a member of temporary staff would place him retroactively under the system of contracts of indefinite duration. The appellant argues that that is not the case and submits that the CST infringed his right to an effective judicial remedy in finding that he could not apply for partial annulment of the decision to limit the extension period of his contract, namely that part of the decision limiting the duration of the extension in time.

(*) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia