- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Cases T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T-98/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO — MasterCard International ([We IntelliGence the World and Others]) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU figurative marks We IntelliGence the World, currencymachineassistant, robodealer, currencyassistant, tradingcurrencyassistant, CKPL, moneypersonalassistant, moneyassistant, currencypersonalassistant, CNTX Trading, AIdealer and CNTX — Earlier EU and UK figurative marks representing two intertwining circles or two overlapping circles — Suspension of proceedings — Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0084
62019TA0084
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.7.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 230/30
(Cases T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T-98/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Applications for the EU figurative marks We IntelliGence the World, currencymachineassistant, robodealer, currencyassistant, tradingcurrencyassistant, CKPL, moneypersonalassistant, moneyassistant, currencypersonalassistant, CNTX Trading, AIdealer and CNTX - Earlier EU and UK figurative marks representing two intertwining circles or two overlapping circles - Suspension of proceedings - Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(2020/C 230/38)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and K. Gajek, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MasterCard International, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: J. Olsen, B. Hitchens and P. Andreottola, Solicitors, and G. Tritton and A. Muir Wood, Barristers)
Re:
Twelve actions brought against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2018 (Cases R 1062/2018-2, R 1059/2018-2, R 1058/2018-2, R 1057/2018-2, R 1056/2018-2, R 1060/2018-2, R 1055/2018-2, R 1054/2018-2, R 1053/2018-2, R 986/2018-2, R 1063/2018-2 and R 1064/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between MasterCard International and Cinkciarz.pl.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Joins Cases T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T-98/19 for the purposes of the judgment;
2.Annuls the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 December 2018 (Cases R 1062/2018-2, R 1059/2018-2, R 1058/2018-2, R 1057/2018-2, R 1056/2018-2, R 1060/2018-2, R 1055/2018-2, R 1054/2018-2, R 1053/2018-2, R 986/2018-2, R 1063/2018-2 and R 1064/2018-2);
3.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court;
4.Orders MasterCard International, Inc. to bear its own costs relating to the proceedings before the Court.
(*) Language of the case: English.
OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.