I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-717/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PHILIBON - Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON - Relative ground for refusal - Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2020/C 255/18)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: B.D. — Boyer Developpement (Moissac, France) (represented by: É. Junca, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, A. Folliard-Monguiral, H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Philicon-97 AD (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: V. Pavlov and M. Lazarov, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2018 (Case R 375/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Philicon 97 and B. D. — Boyer Developpement.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders B. D. — Boyer Developpement to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140
* * *
(*) Language of the case: English.