- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-630/22: Action brought on 10 October 2022 — Topper Argentina v EUIPO — Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology (wetoper)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0630
62022TN0630
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.12.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/56
(Case T-630/22)
(2022/C 463/82)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Topper Argentina, SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: J. M. Mora Cortés, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology Co. Ltd (Qingdao, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark wetoper — EU trade mark No 18 249 968
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2022 in Case R 2126/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener (if it enters an appearance and intervenes in these proceedings) to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Operations Department and before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.