EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-782/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Cogebi and Cogebi v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0782

62022TA0782

April 17, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3462

10.6.2024

(Case T-782/22)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition on purchasing, importing or transferring, directly or indirectly, in the European Union, goods which generate significant revenues for Russia as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - Mica products - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures which directly affects the legal situation of importers - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Right of access to the file - Freedom to conduct a business - Proportionality)

(C/2024/3462)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Cogebi (Brussels, Belgium), Cogebi, a.s., (Tábor, Czech Republic) (represented by: H. over de Linden, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and E. Nadbath, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: M. Kriisa, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. Carpus Carcea and L. Puccio, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Article 3i of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 (OJ 2022 L 259I, p. 3), in so far as Regulation 2022/1904 inserts CN code 6814 (worked mica and articles of mica) into the list of goods which generate significant revenues for the Russian Federation as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation No 833/2014 and whose direct or indirect purchase, import or transfer in the European Union is prohibited by Article 3i of that regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Cogebi and Cogebi, a.s. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interim proceedings;

3.Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Estonia to bear their own costs.

*

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3462/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

15

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia