- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-292/17: Action brought on 16 May 2017 — Région Île-de-France v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0292
62017TN0292
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 231/41
(Case T-292/17)
(2017/C 231/51)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Région Île-de-France (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the European Commission of 2 February 2017 (SA.26763 — (2014/C) –), concerning the aid scheme implemented by France in favour of bus undertakings in the Île-de-France region, in so far as it classified that scheme as State aid;
—order the Commission to pay all the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission refused to classify the support scheme for the region as existing aid.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons for the contested decision. This plea is divided into two parts:
—First part, alleging a failure to state reasons relating to the criterion of selectivity.
—Second part, alleging a failure to state reasons relating to the criterion of undue economic advantage.