I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Public procurement - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 57(4)(c) and (g) - Award of public service contracts - Optional grounds for exclusion - Grave professional misconduct - Calling into question the economic operator’s integrity - Prior contract - Performance - Breaches - Termination - Judicial remedy - Contracting authority’s assessment of the contractual breach - Preclusion until the end of the judicial proceedings)
(2020/C 45/06)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Indaco Service Soc. coop. sociale, acting in its own name and as agent of Coop. sociale il Melograno
Defendant: Ufficio Territoriale del Governo Taranto
Intervener: Cometa Società Cooperativa Sociale
Article 57(4)(c) and (g) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted as precluding rules of national law pursuant to which an action before the courts against a decision to terminate a public contract, taken by a contracting authority on account of ‘grave professional misconduct’ arising during performance of the contract, prevents the contracting authority which issues a new call for tenders from excluding an operator, at the stage of selecting tenderers, on the basis of an assessment of that operator’s reliability.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
* * *