EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-238/22: Action brought on 29 April 2022 — Narzieva v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0238

62022TN0238

April 29, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/34

(Case T-238/22)

(2022/C 257/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Saodat Narzieva (Tashkent, Uzbekistan) (represented by: J. Grand d’Esnon, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

principally, annul:

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022, (1) in so far as it concerns Ms Narzieva;

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022, (2) in so far as it concerns Ms Narzieva;

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/329 of 25 February 2022, (3)

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/330 of 25 February 2022; (4)

in the alternative, annul:

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022, in so far as it concerns Ms Narzieva;

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022, in so far as it concerns Ms Narzieva;

Article 1(2)(f) and (g) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/329 of 25 February 2022;

Article 1(1)(f) and (g) of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/330 of 25 February 2022;

in any event, order the Council of the European Union to pay Ms Narzieva the sum of EUR 20,000 under Article 140(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court for the costs she has incurred in defending her interests.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-234/22, Ismailova v Council.

(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 55).

(2) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 3).

(3) Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/329 of 25 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 50, p. 1).

(4) Council Regulation (EU) 2022/330 of 25 February 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 51, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia