EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-97/22, DC (Withdrawal after performance of the contract): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen — Germany) — DC v HJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) — Right of withdrawal for off-premises contracts — Information requirements for the trader concerned — Failure of that trader to inform the consumer — Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal — Withdrawal after the performance of the contract — Consequences)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0097

62022CA0097

May 17, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

(Case C-97/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) DC (Withdrawal after performance of the contract))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2011/83/EU - Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) - Right of withdrawal for off-premises contracts - Information requirements for the trader concerned - Failure of that trader to inform the consumer - Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal - Withdrawal after the performance of the contract - Consequences)

(2023/C 235/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DC

Defendant: HJ

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,

must be interpreted as meaning that it exempts a consumer from any obligation to pay for performance provided pursuant to an off-premises contract, where the trader concerned did not provide him or her with the information referred to in Article 14(4)(a)(i) of that directive and that consumer exercised his or her right of withdrawal after the performance of that contract.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 165, 19.4.2022.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia