I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-363/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price coordination throughout the EEA - Concerted practice - Exchanges of sensitive business information - Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission - Rights of the defence and right to be heard - Inalterability of the measure - Single and continuous infringement - Restriction of competition by object - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Value of sales - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(2021/C 471/50)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: H.-J. Niemeyer, M. Röhrig, I.-L. Stoicescu and P. Neideck, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, B. Ernst, T. Franchoo, C. Sjödin and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for, primarily, annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 1768 final of 21 March 2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40136 — Capacitors), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, annulment of the fine imposed on it by that decision or a reduction in the amount of that fine.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.