I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-466/16 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 - Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Country-wide dumping margin - Actions for annulment - Non-exporting producer - Locus standi - Direct concern)
(2019/C 139/06)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent, and N. Tuominen, avocată)
Other parties to the proceedings: Marquis Energy LLC (represented by: P. Vander Schueren, advocaat, and N. Mizulin and M. Peristeraki, avocats), European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and M. França, Agents), ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol (represented by: O. Prost and A. Massot, avocats)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 June 2016, Marquis Energy v Council (T-277/13, not published, EU:T:2016:343);
2.Dismisses the action for annulment brought by Marquis Energy LLC as inadmissible;
3.Orders Marquis Energy LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union both in relation to the proceedings at first instance and the appeal;
4.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs both in the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019139EN.01000901-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019139EN.01000901-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.