EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-212/21 P and C-223/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2023 — European Investment Bank (EIB) v ClientEarth, European Commission (C-212/21 P), European Commission v Client Earth, European Investment Bank (EIB) (C-223/21 P) (Appeal — Environment — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 2(1)(f) — Concept of ‘environmental law’ — Article 2(1)(g) — Concept of ‘administrative act’ — Article 10(1) — Internal review of administrative acts — Resolution of the Board of Directors of the European Investment Bank (EIB) approving the financing of a biomass power generation plant — Rejection of the request for internal review of that resolution as inadmissible — Independence of the EIB in the sphere of its financial operations — Article 271(c) TFEU — Scope)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0212

62021CA0212

July 6, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/2

(Joined Cases C-212/21 P and C-223/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Environment - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Article 2(1)(f) - Concept of ‘environmental law’ - Article 2(1)(g) - Concept of ‘administrative act’ - Article 10(1) - Internal review of administrative acts - Resolution of the Board of Directors of the European Investment Bank (EIB) approving the financing of a biomass power generation plant - Rejection of the request for internal review of that resolution as inadmissible - Independence of the EIB in the sphere of its financial operations - Article 271(c) TFEU - Scope)

(2023/C 296/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

(Case C-212/21 P)

Appellant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: K. Carr, G. Faedo and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, and by J. Bouckaert and G. Schaiko, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: ClientEarth (represented by: S. Abram KC and J. Flynn, KC and H. Leith, Barrister), European Commission (represented by: F. Blanc and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

(Case C-223/21 P)

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Blanc and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: ClientEarth (represented by S. Abram KC and J. Flynn KC and H. Leith, Barrister), European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by K. Carr, G. Faedo and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, and by J. Bouckaert and G. Schaiko, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeals;

2.Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Commission to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by ClientEarth.

OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia