- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-547/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 October 2015 — Interservice d.o.o. Koper v Sándor Horváth
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0547
62015CN0547
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/9
(Case C-547/15)
(2016/C 027/11)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Interservice d.o.o. Koper
Defendant: Sándor Horváth
Questions referred
1.Must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that not only the person who enters into a transport agreement with the seller for the transport of the goods (the contractual or main carrier), but also the person who carries out the transport, in full or in part, on the basis of another transport agreement concluded with the contractual or main carrier (the transport subcontractor), is to be regarded as a carrier of the goods?
2.If the first question is answered in the affirmative, must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, the transport subcontractor is required, before continuing the transport of the goods, to ensure in a satisfactory manner that the main carrier actually produced the goods at the customs office of destination in the manner prescribed?
(1) Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302) (OJ 2014 L 367, p. 126).