I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
(Case T-100/22) (*)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/2310)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Ciar SpA (Pesaro, Italy) (represented by: L. Goglia, S. Lavagnini and B. Villa, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and R. Raponi, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Motion SpA (Forlì, Italy) (represented by: S. Corona and G. Ciccone, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 December 2021 (Case R 50/2017-3).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Ciar SpA and Motion SpA shall bear their own costs and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*)
Language of the case: Italian.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2310/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
(C/2024/2310)
Language of the case: Italian.