I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-337/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision - Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Request for conversion into a national trade mark application - Ground precluding conversion - Non-use of the EU trade mark - Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(2022/C 311/12)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Hochmann Marketing GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Jennings, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2020 (Case R 187/2020-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hochmann Marketing GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.